Small Bits of Chaos: Passports, Financial Crypto

Ryan Singel has a good post on chipped passports:

Bailey is right that the new passport will be harder to forge with the inclusion of RFID chips, especially since the chip would be digitally signed to prevent changes to the data in the chip. That’s a solid security measure.

But, the chips create a new hazard, since older passports, which have a ten year expiration, will remain valid until they expire.

An unencrypted RFID enabled passport can be skimmed by a hidden reader most easily when the bearer is showing it at a money-changer, giving it to a hotel for safe keeping in the safe or checking into a hostel.

The data — inluding the digital photo — can then be used to create a phony version of the *old* passport, using the name, passport number, and possibly even the picture of a real passport holder.

Firstly, you don’t need an RFID chip to get the benefits of a digital signature. You can use a physical print out (say, several 2-d bar codes, or the signing technology used for physical mail), or a contact chip, like smart-cards have.

Secondly, if the chip isn’t doing a signature, then I can copy the entire block, data and signature, and insert it in a new RFID chip. Since there will be a chip that’s read, I may be able to get away with a lower quality passport fake.


Adam Shostack, another of the original organizers, thinks that the reason for the failure of financial cryptography is simple. “People are conservative in how they pay for things,”

is only one of things that Peter Wayner has to say in this Technology Review article.

3 thoughts on “Small Bits of Chaos: Passports, Financial Crypto

  1. I’m not sure that a blanket statement such as “FC failed” is totally accurate. FC was the foundation of things like PayPal and the gold currencies; those businesses just realised that the crypto component was a lot smaller than the cryptographers realised.
    I had an interesting discussion with Ben Laurie over on the Caps talk that was highly indicative. We fussed around for a while and then he asked whether in my definition of FC, cryptogaphy was optional?
    To which the answer is “yes.” Once you get over that hurdle, it’s a lot easier to see what FC can do, and how crypto can help.

  2. You’ll actually note that FC failed is Peter’s interpretation. I simply said that people are conservative in their adoption of new systems. And as Nocera pointed out in that same article, it took credit cards 30 years to overcome cheques in volume.
    So I don’t think Financial crypto has failed, so much as not taken over the world in its first 5-15 years (depending on how you count.)

  3. Passport Discussions

    In response to Ryan Singel’s comments on my passport post: Ryan, I’m glad I can give you some good fodder for discussion. In response I’d argue that there are many ways to forge the old paper-based passports – just ask…

Comments are closed.