<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consent, Submit, Forest, Trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2005/07/consent-submit-forest-trees.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2005/07/consent-submit-forest-trees.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2005/07/consent-submit-forest-trees.html/comment-page-1#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=918#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Neither submit nor consent appears in the 4th amendment.  If you&#039;re scrutinizing those words, you&#039;re scrutinizing the wrong words.  IMHO.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Neither submit nor consent appears in the 4th amendment.  If you&#8217;re scrutinizing those words, you&#8217;re scrutinizing the wrong words.  IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbs</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2005/07/consent-submit-forest-trees.html/comment-page-1#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>dbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=918#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>But the direct interpretation of the letter and words of the laws is exactly what the &#039;Law&#039; (as a profession an procedure) is all about.  In particular to the Constitution, the written word is basically all we have to go by, so getting down to each individual word and the meaning therein is all there is to work with.
Written law is a fixed, ummutable basis on which to build interpretation.  Unless that law is changed or overturned, the very words must function as the foundation for all implementation and application.  It&#039;s no wonder every word is scrutinized within an inch of it&#039;s ink.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the direct interpretation of the letter and words of the laws is exactly what the &#8216;Law&#8217; (as a profession an procedure) is all about.  In particular to the Constitution, the written word is basically all we have to go by, so getting down to each individual word and the meaning therein is all there is to work with.<br />
Written law is a fixed, ummutable basis on which to build interpretation.  Unless that law is changed or overturned, the very words must function as the foundation for all implementation and application.  It&#8217;s no wonder every word is scrutinized within an inch of it&#8217;s ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

