<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People&#8217;s Bank of Connecticut, 90,000 SSNs, UPS &amp; TransUnion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/01/peoples-bank-of-connecticut-90000-ssns-ups-transunion.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/01/peoples-bank-of-connecticut-90000-ssns-ups-transunion.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David T.S. Fraser</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/01/peoples-bank-of-connecticut-90000-ssns-ups-transunion.html/comment-page-1#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>David T.S. Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=1399#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>I expect they&#039;ll be looking at using encryption pretty quicly. A similar incident happened to ABN AMRO last month (See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2005/12/incident-tape-containing-records-of-2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Incident: Tape containing records of 2 million mortgagors lost&lt;/a&gt;). Luckily, the tape was found by DHL but the bank announced that it would switch to an encrypted link to transmit the info (See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2005/12/handle-your-incident-well-and-good.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Handle your incident well and good publicity may follow&lt;/a&gt;).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect they&#8217;ll be looking at using encryption pretty quicly. A similar incident happened to ABN AMRO last month (See: <a href="http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2005/12/incident-tape-containing-records-of-2.html" rel="nofollow">The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Incident: Tape containing records of 2 million mortgagors lost</a>). Luckily, the tape was found by DHL but the bank announced that it would switch to an encrypted link to transmit the info (See: <a href="http://www.privacylawyer.ca/blog/2005/12/handle-your-incident-well-and-good.html" rel="nofollow">The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Handle your incident well and good publicity may follow</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Walsh</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/01/peoples-bank-of-connecticut-90000-ssns-ups-transunion.html/comment-page-1#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=1399#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t be read w/out a mainframe?
Just buy &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/b5b7h&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this tape drive&lt;/a&gt; and then:
hax0r@solaris%~ dd if=/dev/rmt/0 conv=ibm
At this point, I don&#039;t think I want to know the format of these records, but I&#039;m fearful I could find out by learning about everybody&#039;s favorite legacy technology, EDI.  Especially the transaction sets pertaining to credit reports and mortgage applications.
Is it *really* cheaper to do this via UPS compared to, oh I don&#039;t know, XML over an encrypted link?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t be read w/out a mainframe?<br />
Just buy <a href="http://tinyurl.com/b5b7h" rel="nofollow">this tape drive</a> and then:<br />
hax0r@solaris%~ dd if=/dev/rmt/0 conv=ibm<br />
At this point, I don&#8217;t think I want to know the format of these records, but I&#8217;m fearful I could find out by learning about everybody&#8217;s favorite legacy technology, EDI.  Especially the transaction sets pertaining to credit reports and mortgage applications.<br />
Is it *really* cheaper to do this via UPS compared to, oh I don&#8217;t know, XML over an encrypted link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
