<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Down Side of &#8220;Strong&#8221; Authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/07/the-down-side-of-strong-authentication.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/07/the-down-side-of-strong-authentication.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/07/the-down-side-of-strong-authentication.html/comment-page-1#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=1857#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>The adage bad security is worse than no security comes to mind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The adage bad security is worse than no security comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Adams</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/07/the-down-side-of-strong-authentication.html/comment-page-1#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=1857#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>This already happened in the UK with ATM fraud - the banks successfully shifted fraud damage over to account holders by claiming that their systems were infalliable. The threat of successful litigation made them change the rules in 1993:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This already happened in the UK with ATM fraud &#8211; the banks successfully shifted fraud damage over to account holders by claiming that their systems were infalliable. The threat of successful litigation made them change the rules in 1993:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/21/phantoms_and_rogues/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.phantomwithdrawals.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

