<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/11/the-new-transparency.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/11/the-new-transparency.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scribe</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/11/the-new-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 07:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2083#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;The theft happened three months ago, why has the news only just been made public?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;
My cynical answer to this (amongst other answers) is that we&#039;re still figuring out how to &quot;market&quot; the idea of &quot;trust&quot; as data becomes both more fluid and more of an identity. Thus, marketing-wise, it&#039;s obviously bad if customers find out their details have leaked before they&#039;ve been &#039;officially&#039; informed. Similarly, it&#039;s also good to confirm that security is the tightest it&#039;s ever been.
The gray area comes when data &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; have been leaked, but the customer is, in all probability, quite safe. From one perspective, a &#039;press release&#039; on this threatens to pierce the trustability of a company. On the other hand, being &#039;open&#039; about breaches is a signal of honesty - a sign to the consumer that the company can be trusted to come clean in future.
In my cyncial view, 3 months is the time taken to decide the way in which a press release should be constructed/handled, like a very rushed and somewhat forced advertising campaign.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>The theft happened three months ago, why has the news only just been made public?</i>&#8221;<br />
My cynical answer to this (amongst other answers) is that we&#8217;re still figuring out how to &#8220;market&#8221; the idea of &#8220;trust&#8221; as data becomes both more fluid and more of an identity. Thus, marketing-wise, it&#8217;s obviously bad if customers find out their details have leaked before they&#8217;ve been &#8216;officially&#8217; informed. Similarly, it&#8217;s also good to confirm that security is the tightest it&#8217;s ever been.<br />
The gray area comes when data <i>might</i> have been leaked, but the customer is, in all probability, quite safe. From one perspective, a &#8216;press release&#8217; on this threatens to pierce the trustability of a company. On the other hand, being &#8216;open&#8217; about breaches is a signal of honesty &#8211; a sign to the consumer that the company can be trusted to come clean in future.<br />
In my cyncial view, 3 months is the time taken to decide the way in which a press release should be constructed/handled, like a very rushed and somewhat forced advertising campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Veryard</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2006/11/the-new-transparency.html/comment-page-1#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Veryard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2083#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam.
NatWest is a bank, part of the Royal Bank of Scotland, the fifth largest bank in the world.
The Nationwide Building Society is the world&#039;s largest building society.
Two entirely different beasts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam.<br />
NatWest is a bank, part of the Royal Bank of Scotland, the fifth largest bank in the world.<br />
The Nationwide Building Society is the world&#8217;s largest building society.<br />
Two entirely different beasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

