<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defend Traditional Marriage In Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: albatross</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>albatross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>See, this is what you get when you let liberals make laws.  First they get rid of all the guns, and then they have to find some complicated legal solution to make pregnancy lead to marriage.  Haven&#039;t these guys ever heard of shotguns?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, this is what you get when you let liberals make laws.  First they get rid of all the guns, and then they have to find some complicated legal solution to make pregnancy lead to marriage.  Haven&#8217;t these guys ever heard of shotguns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9to1</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>9to1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>Would this mean that anyone who had children with more than one other person would be jailed for bigamy?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this mean that anyone who had children with more than one other person would be jailed for bigamy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bint alshamsa</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>bint alshamsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>This seems like an absolutely disastrous idea. Maybe I&#039;m panicking but it seems like the results could be catestrophic if this was passed and the courts did NOT act as the authors of it are hoping they would. It&#039;s a hell of a lot to risk. Of course, this sounds especially frightening to me given the implications that something like this could have even if it&#039;s only around temporarily until the courts go through the motions of striking it down. I&#039;m the mother of a child with someone I never married and we haven&#039;t been a couple in a little over a decade. My significant other and I have raised my daughter together for over six years, which is more than half of her life. I can&#039;t get married because I am currently dying from cancer and if I did, then I&#039;d be kicked off of the medicare program that I need to pay for my medical needs. If it were declared that any two people having a child together is the equivalent of having a marriage ceremony, then my ex-boyfriend would suddenly become my ex-husband which would entitle him to a lot greater standing in the family courts when it comes to who will have custody of my daughter when I die.
This is far too complicated for me to even wrap my brains around right now. There has got to be a better way!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like an absolutely disastrous idea. Maybe I&#8217;m panicking but it seems like the results could be catestrophic if this was passed and the courts did NOT act as the authors of it are hoping they would. It&#8217;s a hell of a lot to risk. Of course, this sounds especially frightening to me given the implications that something like this could have even if it&#8217;s only around temporarily until the courts go through the motions of striking it down. I&#8217;m the mother of a child with someone I never married and we haven&#8217;t been a couple in a little over a decade. My significant other and I have raised my daughter together for over six years, which is more than half of her life. I can&#8217;t get married because I am currently dying from cancer and if I did, then I&#8217;d be kicked off of the medicare program that I need to pay for my medical needs. If it were declared that any two people having a child together is the equivalent of having a marriage ceremony, then my ex-boyfriend would suddenly become my ex-husband which would entitle him to a lot greater standing in the family courts when it comes to who will have custody of my daughter when I die.<br />
This is far too complicated for me to even wrap my brains around right now. There has got to be a better way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamzen</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator>tamzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3198</guid>
		<description>Love it. Celtic marriage in Ireland required pregnancy to prove the couple was suitable. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it. Celtic marriage in Ireland required pregnancy to prove the couple was suitable. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonomasia</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonomasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>This may be on the radio soon - I&#039;ve mentioned it to WOTMR.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wayofthemasterradio.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wayofthemasterradio.com/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be on the radio soon &#8211; I&#8217;ve mentioned it to WOTMR.<br />
<a href="http://www.wayofthemasterradio.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wayofthemasterradio.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>Also...shouldn&#039;t old people be barred, too?  I mean, if two 75 year-olds get hitched, they clearly won&#039;t be able to procreate or even adopt, I would say.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230;shouldn&#8217;t old people be barred, too?  I mean, if two 75 year-olds get hitched, they clearly won&#8217;t be able to procreate or even adopt, I would say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/02/defend-traditional-marriage-in-washington.html/comment-page-1#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2205#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Are they using &#039;initiative&#039; in the sense of &quot;initiative, referendum, and recall&#039;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they using &#8216;initiative&#8217; in the sense of &#8220;initiative, referendum, and recall&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

