<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Side Of Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/04/another-side-of-copyright.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/04/another-side-of-copyright.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beck</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/04/another-side-of-copyright.html/comment-page-1#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2301#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>One of the comments on The Chronicle article says &quot;Their papers also included clear disclaimers warning Turnitin not to index the papers.&quot;
I still don&#039;t think they can sue for standard US copyright infringement.  In Canada or Europe they would be able to assert moral authority over the use of their work, but US law doesn&#039;t recognize that right.
That effective EULA makes this an interesting case.  Since it wasn&#039;t part of a negotiated contract I guess it will be evaluated with compliance to common law.  Could be fun.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the comments on The Chronicle article says &#8220;Their papers also included clear disclaimers warning Turnitin not to index the papers.&#8221;<br />
I still don&#8217;t think they can sue for standard US copyright infringement.  In Canada or Europe they would be able to assert moral authority over the use of their work, but US law doesn&#8217;t recognize that right.<br />
That effective EULA makes this an interesting case.  Since it wasn&#8217;t part of a negotiated contract I guess it will be evaluated with compliance to common law.  Could be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beck</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2007/04/another-side-of-copyright.html/comment-page-1#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2301#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>While I like to see people standing up for themselves, I am not sure that copyright is applicable here.  I draw a parallel with Google Print where the content of copyrighted material is stored in a searchable database but the end product does not expose the full content of the copyrighted material to end users.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I like to see people standing up for themselves, I am not sure that copyright is applicable here.  I draw a parallel with Google Print where the content of copyrighted material is stored in a searchable database but the end product does not expose the full content of the copyrighted material to end users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

