<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSO&#8217;s FUD Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/csos-fud-watch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/csos-fud-watch.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.K. DeLong</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/csos-fud-watch.html/comment-page-1#comment-4683</link>
		<dc:creator>B.K. DeLong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2777#comment-4683</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that was one of the contributing reasons we stopped the Defacement Mirror at Attrition.org. So many vendors were pointing to defacements as a means for generating revenue and stirring up FUD about the insecurity of everything. We also had vendors utilizing the site for daily intelligence reports they resold as a service sans attribution.
I suspect, however, it&#039;s far easier to anecdotally call people out then back it up with data. It will be interesting to see how much pressure CSO will get from advertisers to do just that. Or whether they&#039;ll be calling out specific vendors instead of focusing on bogus trends.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that was one of the contributing reasons we stopped the Defacement Mirror at Attrition.org. So many vendors were pointing to defacements as a means for generating revenue and stirring up FUD about the insecurity of everything. We also had vendors utilizing the site for daily intelligence reports they resold as a service sans attribution.<br />
I suspect, however, it&#8217;s far easier to anecdotally call people out then back it up with data. It will be interesting to see how much pressure CSO will get from advertisers to do just that. Or whether they&#8217;ll be calling out specific vendors instead of focusing on bogus trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

