<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack Jones on Risk Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/jack-jones-on-risk-management.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/jack-jones-on-risk-management.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonomasia</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/jack-jones-on-risk-management.html/comment-page-1#comment-4622</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonomasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2756#comment-4622</guid>
		<description>According to this book
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reckoning-Risk-Learning-Live-Uncertainty/dp/0140297863&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reckoning-Risk-Learning-Live-Uncertainty/dp/0140297863&lt;/a&gt;
probabilities are best communicated using numbers (e.g. 15 out of 100 people in this situation will find ...) because this avoid confusion over what the probability applies to.
It seems to me the problem at the start of the podcast is as much about communicating risk assessment as forming it in the first place.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this book<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reckoning-Risk-Learning-Live-Uncertainty/dp/0140297863" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Reckoning-Risk-Learning-Live-Uncertainty/dp/0140297863</a><br />
probabilities are best communicated using numbers (e.g. 15 out of 100 people in this situation will find &#8230;) because this avoid confusion over what the probability applies to.<br />
It seems to me the problem at the start of the podcast is as much about communicating risk assessment as forming it in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/jack-jones-on-risk-management.html/comment-page-1#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2756#comment-4621</guid>
		<description>His whitepaper &quot;An Introduction to Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR)&quot; is standard reading on my team...great to see him speak, thanks for the post!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His whitepaper &#8220;An Introduction to Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR)&#8221; is standard reading on my team&#8230;great to see him speak, thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/jack-jones-on-risk-management.html/comment-page-1#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2756#comment-4620</guid>
		<description>Adam,
Thanks for the kind post.  Jack and I have -no- issues calling ourselves &quot;New School&quot; :)
We&#039;ll probably be among your most vocal advocates.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,<br />
Thanks for the kind post.  Jack and I have -no- issues calling ourselves &#8220;New School&#8221; :)<br />
We&#8217;ll probably be among your most vocal advocates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

