<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Black Hat Tax?&#8221; Show me the money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/the-black-hat-tax-show-me-the-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/the-black-hat-tax-show-me-the-money.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auren Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/the-black-hat-tax-show-me-the-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-4656</link>
		<dc:creator>Auren Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2767#comment-4656</guid>
		<description>the sample size before writing was only 12.  admittedly, that&#039;s super low to make a generalization.   but after writing the article, i&#039;ve gotten hundreds of responses from CEOs and CTOs at consumer internet cos -- pretty much all them estimate it is at least 25% (and many say more).   i will admit this is totally not scientific and it would be great if someone did a more comprehensive study that either backs up or refutes the Black Hat Tax claim.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the sample size before writing was only 12.  admittedly, that&#8217;s super low to make a generalization.   but after writing the article, i&#8217;ve gotten hundreds of responses from CEOs and CTOs at consumer internet cos &#8212; pretty much all them estimate it is at least 25% (and many say more).   i will admit this is totally not scientific and it would be great if someone did a more comprehensive study that either backs up or refutes the Black Hat Tax claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brodbck</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/the-black-hat-tax-show-me-the-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-4655</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brodbck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2767#comment-4655</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m missing something, but isn&#039;t this a bit like figuring out the cost of putting locks on car doors, and then calling it the &quot;auto theft tax?&quot;  It just strikes me as slightly absurd to phrase it that way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something, but isn&#8217;t this a bit like figuring out the cost of putting locks on car doors, and then calling it the &#8220;auto theft tax?&#8221;  It just strikes me as slightly absurd to phrase it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

