<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office Can Now Fine Your Ass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/uk-information-commissioners-office-can-now-fine-your-ass.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/uk-information-commissioners-office-can-now-fine-your-ass.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/05/uk-information-commissioners-office-can-now-fine-your-ass.html/comment-page-1#comment-4623</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2757#comment-4623</guid>
		<description>You beat me to this one.  I was working on a post, which said:
Adding teeth to a law is clearly going to help somewhat.  &quot;Deliberately or recklessly&quot; is a pretty high standard.  I have mixed feelings about if it&#039;s the right standard.  On the one hand, I&#039;d like to see more enforcement, on the other hand, a lot of security investment is mis-placed, mis-applied or mis-guided.  Not following the herd shouldn&#039;t result in fines.  Not following good risk management practices, or intentionally placing people at risk?  That&#039;s a different story.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You beat me to this one.  I was working on a post, which said:<br />
Adding teeth to a law is clearly going to help somewhat.  &#8220;Deliberately or recklessly&#8221; is a pretty high standard.  I have mixed feelings about if it&#8217;s the right standard.  On the one hand, I&#8217;d like to see more enforcement, on the other hand, a lot of security investment is mis-placed, mis-applied or mis-guided.  Not following the herd shouldn&#8217;t result in fines.  Not following good risk management practices, or intentionally placing people at risk?  That&#8217;s a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

