<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CTOs, Product Management and Program Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/ctos-product-management-and-program-management.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/ctos-product-management-and-program-management.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bullied</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/ctos-product-management-and-program-management.html/comment-page-1#comment-5182</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bullied</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2932#comment-5182</guid>
		<description>Eric, I like this post. I just wanted to point out that Microsoft has different titles for these positions than most organizations adopting product management.
I&#039;m not saying they are wrong - clearly, they work for the organization, and that&#039;s what&#039;s most important.
But typically the role of a program manager at MSFT is filled by a &quot;product manager&quot; at other companies. I think MSFT product managers are predominantly marketing (outbound &amp; research) focused, which are typically referred to as product marketing managers.
While a CTO could execute the role you define here (and I&#039;m sure some have with great success), I would lean towards saying that if you want to have product management, a VP, Product or CPO (Chief Product Officer) would be the one researching and understanding the market, defining what to build and so on.
This way, product has a seat at the management table and it&#039;s not left to one individual to both identify market need, define what to build and then actually be the one responsible for building it.
But, like I said - it&#039;s important to find what works for all organizations in order to appropriately satisfy the need(s) of the markets they are going after.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I like this post. I just wanted to point out that Microsoft has different titles for these positions than most organizations adopting product management.<br />
I&#8217;m not saying they are wrong &#8211; clearly, they work for the organization, and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s most important.<br />
But typically the role of a program manager at MSFT is filled by a &#8220;product manager&#8221; at other companies. I think MSFT product managers are predominantly marketing (outbound &#038; research) focused, which are typically referred to as product marketing managers.<br />
While a CTO could execute the role you define here (and I&#8217;m sure some have with great success), I would lean towards saying that if you want to have product management, a VP, Product or CPO (Chief Product Officer) would be the one researching and understanding the market, defining what to build and so on.<br />
This way, product has a seat at the management table and it&#8217;s not left to one individual to both identify market need, define what to build and then actually be the one responsible for building it.<br />
But, like I said &#8211; it&#8217;s important to find what works for all organizations in order to appropriately satisfy the need(s) of the markets they are going after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
