<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Costs of Secrecy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/the-costs-of-secrecy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/the-costs-of-secrecy.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2008/10/the-costs-of-secrecy.html/comment-page-1#comment-5139</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=2920#comment-5139</guid>
		<description>I read it.  I am of two minds about it.  Mind 1 says, &quot;Wow.  These tech guys really get it, and are taking yet another important step into layers 8 and 9 of the stack&quot;.
Mind 2 says &quot;A paper that discusses incentive structures impeding the emergence of cooperation, with its earliest citation being of a 1983 Hirshleifer paper?  Grumble...&quot;.
With their data, and the approach they use, these guys have an opportunity to move beyond the game-theoretic just-so stories that some of the B-school folks in the field like to tell (which are all theory and no data), and I hope their next paper does this. I felt this paper was a bit too data-centric, and didn&#039;t provide sufficient theoretical grounding.  I suspect this reaction is as much due to my indoctrination @Chicago as it is to anything else, so apply the suitable discount rate.
Massive agreement on the respect, BTW.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it.  I am of two minds about it.  Mind 1 says, &#8220;Wow.  These tech guys really get it, and are taking yet another important step into layers 8 and 9 of the stack&#8221;.<br />
Mind 2 says &#8220;A paper that discusses incentive structures impeding the emergence of cooperation, with its earliest citation being of a 1983 Hirshleifer paper?  Grumble&#8230;&#8221;.<br />
With their data, and the approach they use, these guys have an opportunity to move beyond the game-theoretic just-so stories that some of the B-school folks in the field like to tell (which are all theory and no data), and I hope their next paper does this. I felt this paper was a bit too data-centric, and didn&#8217;t provide sufficient theoretical grounding.  I suspect this reaction is as much due to my indoctrination @Chicago as it is to anything else, so apply the suitable discount rate.<br />
Massive agreement on the respect, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

