<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Was Wrong With the Old FISA?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/03/what-was-wrong-with-the-old-fisa.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/03/what-was-wrong-with-the-old-fisa.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Brodbeck</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/03/what-was-wrong-with-the-old-fisa.html/comment-page-1#comment-5600</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brodbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=3072#comment-5600</guid>
		<description>Generally, focusing on persons makes sense.  You&#039;re right there.  The problem is, once you make that shift, you&#039;ve given the government carte blanche to sift through &lt;i&gt;everyone&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; communications as long as they promise to throw out everything that doesn&#039;t relate to that one person.  As we&#039;ve seen over the last eight years, we &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5987804&amp;page=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;can&#039;t trust them to do that&lt;/a&gt;, and worse, if we do find out they haven&#039;t been doing it there&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/34152prs20080219.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;no real way to force them to&lt;/a&gt;.
My fear is that any new law that claims to protect the privacy of U.S. persons will just create a false sense of security.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, focusing on persons makes sense.  You&#8217;re right there.  The problem is, once you make that shift, you&#8217;ve given the government carte blanche to sift through <i>everyone&#8217;s</i> communications as long as they promise to throw out everything that doesn&#8217;t relate to that one person.  As we&#8217;ve seen over the last eight years, we <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5987804&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">can&#8217;t trust them to do that</a>, and worse, if we do find out they haven&#8217;t been doing it there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/34152prs20080219.html" rel="nofollow">no real way to force them to</a>.<br />
My fear is that any new law that claims to protect the privacy of U.S. persons will just create a false sense of security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/03/what-was-wrong-with-the-old-fisa.html/comment-page-1#comment-5599</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=3072#comment-5599</guid>
		<description>If permission is granted to spy on a particular person, how should we handle others whose conversations are also collected?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If permission is granted to spy on a particular person, how should we handle others whose conversations are also collected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
