<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC Delays Red Flags Enforcement Yet Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/11/ftc-delays-red-flags-enforcement-yet-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/11/ftc-delays-red-flags-enforcement-yet-again.html</link>
	<description>The Emergent Chaos Jazz Combo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iang (faith in accounting profession?)</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/11/ftc-delays-red-flags-enforcement-yet-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-6216</link>
		<dc:creator>Iang (faith in accounting profession?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=3250#comment-6216</guid>
		<description>I can understand why lawyers want a certain exception - client attorney privilege needs to be thought out.
But why accountants?  If anything, their access would make them ideally suited to pursuing the programme, in both a positive and negative sense.
So they should presumably craft an alternate.  Maybe this is their opening gambit?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why lawyers want a certain exception &#8211; client attorney privilege needs to be thought out.<br />
But why accountants?  If anything, their access would make them ideally suited to pursuing the programme, in both a positive and negative sense.<br />
So they should presumably craft an alternate.  Maybe this is their opening gambit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://emergentchaos.com/archives/2009/11/ftc-delays-red-flags-enforcement-yet-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-6215</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emergentchaos.com/?p=3250#comment-6215</guid>
		<description>Adding a federal regulation on top of practices imposes costs.  Let&#039;s require them to tell the FTC how often problems are reported to them, and the resolutions.  Then if it turns out that there&#039;s a real issue, we can think about &#039;do we need red flag rules&#039; in place.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding a federal regulation on top of practices imposes costs.  Let&#8217;s require them to tell the FTC how often problems are reported to them, and the resolutions.  Then if it turns out that there&#8217;s a real issue, we can think about &#8216;do we need red flag rules&#8217; in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
