And there may be many others but they haven’t been discovered

Three newly discovered elements were given names on Friday by the General Assembly of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics at a meeting in London.

They are Darmstadtium, or Ds, which has 110 protons in its nucleus and was named after the town in which it was discovered; Roentgenium, or Rg, with 111 protons, named after the discoverer of X-rays Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen; and Copernicium, or Cn, which has 112 protons and is named after the Polish astronomer Copernicus, who disrupted the view that the Earth was the center of the universe.

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-15

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-12

  • Nice of Apple to fix CVE-2011-0997, published in April (http://t.co/kOh6kTvs) #
  • RT @jeremiahg "Steam Web sites hacked, gamer data exposed" http://t.co/daqkExWj < anyone see an attack vector? << Probably social eng 🙂 #
  • RT @josephmenn @daveweigel The winner. RT @KagroX: Why didn't we just make 10/10/10 louder? #
  • RT @WC2A_2AE Anyone interested in border security ought to read the UKBA's response to my FoI on e-passport gates: http://t.co/JzDUklsU #
  • Happy 11/11/11 11:12!

    (As a programmer, I often have trouble with off-by-one errors) #

  • Bryan Sullivan just showed me his new book, "Web Application Security, A Beginner's Guide " It looks really good http://t.co/sNHHzzO1 #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Tools? Feedback please

So about a month ago, I started flowing my tweets over here. I’d love your thoughts on if it’s helpful, hurtful, or you just ignore it in your reader.

[Update: currently arguments run 3:2 against continuing Twitter in the main feed. More (and civil) debate is invited.]

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-11

  • MT @normative How Far Will the Government Go in Collecting and Storing Data about us? New FBI Documents Shed Light http://t.co/zylCo3ES #
  • RT @tqbf If the infosec community was a real influencer in crypto, we'd all be using Twofish instead of AES because of http://t.co/e21kDcwM #
  • .@tqbf has the crypto or vuln community given us more solid building blocks? #
  • I should say that as "I think we'd get more more secure products faster with a different mix." #
  • RT @tqbf People who have a talent for breaking should not be talked out of breaking, is my general concern. << Strongly agree #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-10

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-09

  • RT @Fiona: Go watch The Muppets hang out on Google+. Me: Thank you: http://t.co/HacZWzBA << Is "Cookie Monster" an approved name? #
  • RT @Jim_Harper When I describe @Cato's argument–"reasonable expectation of #privacy quot; FAIL–lawyers steeped in doctrine get confused. #Jones #
  • New blog: "Slow thoughts on Occupy Seattle" http://t.co/13RTo5NE #
  • RT @csoghoian Jones oral argument was awesome. Supreme ct was very hostile to the future surveillance state #
  • RT @bobblakley RT @TSAgov We're approaching Jerry Sandusky to be a possible Team Coach at the #TSA << A touching end to the story #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Slow Thoughts on Occupy Seattle

Corporate ThievesI headed down to Occupy Seattle before a recent vacation, and have been mulling a bit on what I saw, because the lack of a coherent message or leadership or press make it easy to project our own opinions or simply mis-understand what the “Occupy” protests mean, and I wanted to avoid making that mistake. I think I saw two big themes there: an anti-war theme, and a combination of anti-capitalism and anti-corporatism. I think the second is more interesting, because it’s a combination of views, some of which I support, and others I think are somewhat foolish.

I think capitalism is a good thing. I’ve taken a salary from (venture) capitalists who were able to pay me because they captured “surplus value” from startups, and ploughed some of that profit back into more startups. I use the Marixst term of “surplus value” because I understand the Marxist critique, have lived it, and still think it’s a better system than all those others that have been tried from time to time. (I also think that Marx’s critique of capitalism is excellent, and even more so in light of the poorness of his suggested fixes.) The accumulation of capital in private hands greatly expands the range of entrepreneurship, allowing new products and services to emerge. And for those new products to succeed, they need to serve needs better than what preceded them. So we all benefit to a degree from the capital that accumulates in the hands of investors (even with the costs of creative destruction and externalities.)

At the same time, I think that there’s an emergent system of what we might call corporatism that I think is incompatible with a free society, and is in fact incompatible with free markets. By a free market, I mean one in which people contract with each other and with companies, and the court system enforces fair and predictable limits on those contracts. Fair limits might include that the parties came to a genuine meeting of the minds before exchanging value, that contracts are severable (so no indentured servitude or slavery), that interpretation favors the party that received the contract (rather than the drafter), and that neither party engaged in deceit in advertising their services.

Corporatism, at its heart, involves twisting the free market via government intervention in a number of ways:

  • Lobbying for rules that allow the company to exclude competition. See, for example, AT&T’s gradual re-monopolization of the phone system.
  • Manipulations of the contract system in ways which prevent fair redress. These include mandatory binding arbitration, prohibition of class action suits, clauses that allow the contract to remain in force even if the drafter puts in many clauses which shock the conscience of a court.
  • Un-knowable systems (in particular, the American credit system) in which companies work together to ensure that you do what they demand, even if it’s wrong, because if you don’t, they will destroy your ability to contract with anyone else on fair terms.
  • Convincing the government to take all the downside risk and none of the upside of the banking crisis, and then failing to prosecute those who enriched themselves via a game they knew full well was rigged.

Corporatism comes from the discovery that rules and meta-rules (the rules that are used to set the rules) are manipulatable. Of course, this is nothing new:

“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice.” (Smith, “The Wealth of Nations.”

There were a good number of frankly anti-capitalist signs and groups at Occupy Seattle. It’s a free country, they’re entitled to their opinion, and I can disagree.

But they were not the only signs. I saw lots of signs which seemed to take aim at the unaccountable: the bankers, the corporations (“I won’t believe that corporations are people until Texas executes one”). And I think that responses to currently unaccountable corporatism is going to be one of the key outcomes of the Occupy Movement.

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-07

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-06

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Updates from Adam, 2011-11-05

  • RT @StephieShaver They say there's no rest for the wicked but at least there's espresso! FridayWHAT? << friday at BlueHat! #
  • RT @Beaker: Congrats to @mortman on joining @enstratus! First @jamesurquhart then @botchagalupe and now Dave! All good friends together #
  • As I watch @moxie__ give his trust talk at BlueHat, I realize how valuable it is when we disclose attack details, like IP addresses #

Powered by Twitter Tools